Showing posts with label development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label development. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Contrasts in development within individual countries in the developing world

I just came across this article about development and health from the BBC, which I found very interesting and fitting into our topic. On page one the question of 'what is development' is raised, the next page shows the models of development, mentioning Rostow's model as well as comparing South Korea and Burkina Faso. Page three and four are about using development indicators and development differences between countries, providing questions for the reader to think about.

Focus on page five, there you will find a video showing a case study of Brazil, which is a good example of a country which has wide regional variations in development.The video shows the dimensions of development; how different development can be, to which extent it can vary in one country and, that it certainly does vary in most of the countries. Besides, it shows that the gap between rich and poor still exists and probably is going to stay.

For them who would like to test what the learned and already knew about development and health care, try your best making this quiz.

Definition of Development:
Development could be explained as “fierce” process, with “Blood, sweat, and tears”. It is the world in which wisdom demands toughness. (Amartya Sen, Development as freedom, chap2.)

According to Anna Dickson, Development is “an ongoing process of qualitatively ameliorated social, political, and economic change” (Robert O’Brien, Marc William, Global Economic Change).

Characteristics:
  • Political freedom (free and fair elected Institutions, Humans rights)
  • Economic Facilities (Production, consumption, Exchange)
  • Social Opportunities (Good jobs, Higher Education, Health Care)
  • Transparency guaranty (No corruption or Fiscal Paradise)

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

There are many different definitions of sustainable development.
“Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generation to meets their own needs.”
There are three interdependent pillars of sustainable development: 
  1. Environmental
  2. Economical
  3. Social
Source: World Commission on environment and development, Oxford University Press

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT

The United Nation has promoted Political and Economical Institutions and
Values. Democracy, the market, protecting human rights. Egalitarianism as the
Route of the prosperity to the rest of the World. (Culture, Democracy and
Development by Deepak LAL, IMF, september20, 1999).

The relationship between Politics Is the Policies of the IMF and the World Bank in Africa.
In Sub-Sahara Africa the IMF politics of Development achieved growth rates during 1995-1997:
  • Reducing and containing inflationary pressures.
  • Increasing ratio of domestic saving to GDP.
  • Strengthening Fiscal Performance
  • Increasing private sector Investment
  • Improving Export performance
  • Restructuring public expenditures
(International Monetary Funds, August 2000) 


Example of the World Bank – Mauritania: Women Microfinance
Mauritania is helping its tens of thousands of urban poor by creating job opportunities where there once were none. A microfinance program is giving small loans to inner city residents to start small businesses, most of them run by women.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xffDu_EWLWc


by Djibril 

SSL Week 5 - Development

Hello Everybody!

Since the other group of thursday’s presentation on development already gave you an insight about what will be discussed in this lecture,

I wanted to give some background information about the main focus on what Djibril and I are going to talk about Development in our SSL. We’d like to give you some of the reasons why development is an important issue of international relations and the international political economy.

Let me start with an outline of our presentation. Basically, we’ve divided our presentation into three parts. Djbril will start by giving you an overview about development and its characteristics and afterwards I will briefly theorise development looking at Rostow’s influential theory of the ‘Five Stages of Growth’. After taking a critical approach, Djbril will identify and examine the relation between developme

nt and the political in a sufficient overview. Finally, after the conclusion and an outlook, there will be enough time for questions and a discussion, of course.


To get in touch with the topic and make up your minds, I posted some quotations and information about what constitutes development and sustainable development as well as some videos.

Moreover, I found it important to give you a brief overview about the Human Development Report as well as the Human Development Index; as it is vital to know about these.

Bearing the relation between development and the political in mind, I found it important to shortly refer to the Legal framework of the Development Policy of the UN. Therefore, I posted a short summary to provide you with the foundational treaty of the UN outlining ‘development’. As the charter is a constituent treaty; its articles bind all 193 members.


THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT

I will be concentrating on explaining theories on development.

Is the path to development a direct line?

Two ideal types of development analysis can be split into two schools of thought:

  1. Development through modernizing an economic growth – Rostow and Modernization theory
  2. Self development to abolish the dependence – Guder Frank and Dependency theory

Basically, my part of our SSL is split into two parts. Firstly, I will explain W.W. Rostows model of ’The Five Stages of Growth’. The so-called ‘Rostovian take-off model of economic growth’ is one of the major historical models of economic growth. According to Rostow, it is possible to identify all societies, in their economic dimensions, as lying within one of five categories (shown below in the figure). As a matter of course, I will explain this and provide you with more information about what this model constitutes on Thursday. I will discuss Rostow’s understanding of development, take a critical approach and be asking if anyone has suggestions why his theory is out-dated today!


Rostow's five-stage model of development











(Source: Potter, Binns, Eliott & Smiith 1999: 51)

The following figure shows the different stages of different countries.

What do you think why Britain was the 1st to develop fully the preconditions for take-off?

What do you think might be critical about this model?

If you want to know more about the person W.W.Rostow, since we will not have time to go into detail, here you find more background information:

http://www.utexas.edu/faculty/council/2003-2004/memorials/rostow/rostow.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2003/feb/17/guardianobituaries.usa

Further reading:

W. W. Rostow ‘The Five Stages of Growth’ in Mitchell A. Seligson and John T Passe-Smith (eds.) Development and Under-development: The Political Economy of Global Inequality (Lynne Reinner Publishers 2003): 173-180.

Development theory Rostow's five-stage model of development and its relevance in Globalization (2005)

http://jpkc.swu.edu.cn/data/gjzrzygl/web%20prepare20110608/paper/Rostow%20Development%20Model%201960.pdf


NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE BETWEEN INDUSTRIALIZED AND DEVELOPING WORLD

Then, in the second part, I look at the the North-South divide between industrialized and developing world focusing on two main theories:

  1. Liberalist/traditional:
  • believes rich and poor countries alike benefit from free trade.
  1. Structuralist/underdevelopment/dependency school:
  • instead of emphasizing mutual interests, this group emphasizes the conflicts between rich and poor countries

Questions to think about

Has decolonization improved economic conditions of the Third World, or have the rich simply become richer and the poor become poorer?

Is the Third World still economically dependent on the Developed World?

Is the path to development a direct line?


This quotation is going to be discussed:


"We cannot forget that while the iron curtain has been brought down, the poverty curtain still separates two parts of the world community."

Javier Perez de Cuellar, UN Secretary General 1982-1991



I hope I could give you an overview about what is going to be talked and discussed about tomorrow. If anything might be unclear, I am sure during our SSL you will understand because we will be referring and explaining all the given information. We are looking forward to an interesting SSL!

The Right to development


"A developed country is one that allows all its citizens to enjoy a free and healthy life in a safe environment." (Kofi Annan)

This statement is of Secretary-General Kofi Annan's address to the Tenth United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD X), Bangkok, 12 February 2000.

Source: http://www.unescap.org/unis/press/g_05_00.htm
Development is a human right. Everyone is "entitled to participate in, contribute to, and enjoy economic, social, cultural and political development". According to the UN Declaration on the Right to Development - development is a right that belongs to everyone.

Click on this video: http://www.youtube.com/user/unitednations#p/search/2/sAkdVH8SGto

Source: United Nations Video Service


Friday, 17 February 2012

Secret Poverty: the State of Poverty in the west


Secret Poverty: the State of Poverty in the west 
         Liam McLoughlin


Poverty is often described more racially than most expect. A simple test would be to search ‘Poverty’ in Google images, the results show on the first page 33 pictures of black or South Asian people in a state of poverty; this is compared to just one white man shown. Poverty definitions in the west ,for whatever reason, is excluding any plight in the western world, this could be for a Varity of reasons: a superiority complex; the opinion that developed countries do not have such issues; or that the media only focus on poverty in Africa and Asian sub-continent.
The objective of this blog is to focus on the fact that poverty is not a problem exclusive of countries with a low GNP, it is common, abet hidden, in the western world. We will explain the issue by an analysis of the United Kingdom’s own secret poverty.

The United Kingdom Government define poverty in three sections:

Absolute poverty: The inability to maintain ‘body and soul’ through lack of resources.

Relative poverty: Low amount of income in relation to the average income of a normal household income. The use of this is to measure the ability to participate in daily life.

Social exclusion: A result from a combination of unemployment, poor skills, low incomes, poor housing, high crime environments, bad health, and family breakdown.

Meanwhile there are two other types that have in use by the media:
Water poverty: Spending more than 3% of yearly disposable income on water bills.

Fuel poverty: When a household needs to spend more than 10% of its income on heating a home to a reasonable level. A reasonable level is widely reported to be from 18°c to 21°c.
For the purpose of time this post will focus on the first three though it may be worthwhile for the reader to research further into water and fuel poverty.

The level of poverty in the United Kingdom:

The United Kingdom does relatively little to showcase poverty in the United Kingdom, even when it is showed it is mostly focused on either Child or Pensioner poverty. As shown by the higher amount of news coverage to them both; a major factor why the Child and pensioner poverty was a major policy for Labours 2005 manifesto. (an example of one of the many reports of pensioner poverty is shown in the further reading)

The Elizabeth Finn Trust in 2005 found over 3.9 Million single people in the UK was living below the poverty lines in 2005. While figures from the government found that in the 1994-2004 saw that 17-18% of people in the UK lived in poverty and the CIA fact-book mentioned that in 2006 the UK poverty was at 14%. Considering the figures, the people in the United Kingdom who struggle live due to poverty is a high figure. However when seen comparatively with other countries is seen as an acceptable figure, a fact many think is an injustice.

How is Poverty in the UK represented in the media?

Joseph Roundtree foundation report discovered that in the media, most of the reports of poverty were from outside the United Kingdom. In 40 hours worth of non-news television analysis poverty was only mentioned twice, both from the show shameless. The report showed that viewers found poverty in the UK to show negative conisations, such as ‘scroungers’ and ‘benefit cheats’- partially when poverty covered refugees, asylum seekers, or young mothers.
Generally reports show that the issue of Poverty in the United Kingdom is under represented. Even when it is, the media portray the people under the poverty line was a taboo or with distain.
 
However what causes poverty in the UK?
 
A study shown that there is many causal links to poverty in the United Kingdom, however the major causes are:
Disability:  Many whom are disabled may have to rely on state welfare and family support networks to survive. Unable to find suitable work they often have relatively low incomes, resulting as being classified as under the poverty line.

Illness: Unlike the disabled, people are temporary unable to work. Regular illness may push employers to lay off the employee; this has been seen in the prison service for members of staff who fail to pass the ATOS test.

Mental illness: Similar to both illness and disability. People who have long term mental illnesses may struggle to find long term work.

Unemployment: Due to lack of jobs available, lack of training or even the wrong skills for the current market. There is plenty of reasons why members of the public fail to gain employment.

Poor background: People whom have had poor educational upbringings or issues with crime in their youth may have struggles finding employment. Tarnished records and the inability of lack of accessibility to clime the employment ladder may push people into long term unemployment.

Race: It has been found there is a correlation between race and poverty. (http://www.poverty.org.uk/06/index.shtml) The proportion of people who live in low-income households in the United Kingdom is: 20% for White people; 30% for Indians and Black Caribbean’s; 50% for Black Africans; 60% for Pakistanis; and 70% for Bangladeshis.

 
Conclusions
From these figures it is apparent that in the United Kingdom poverty is an issue in the UK and it is clearly represented in the statistics. From the data is has also been discovered what different types of poverty exist and for what reasons people are put in the unfortunate dilemma of being unable to reach out and above the poverty line. The issue is however that the media in the United Kingdom are unwilling, or unable, to portray the issue in a correct manor this is by either pushing the issue under the carpet; displaying poverty to be the fault of the people affected; or turn poverty into comedy pieces like shows shameless. It is clear the way media portray poverty in the UK is the issue and should be further addressed.



Further reading:

Reporting Poverty in the United Kingdom

Statistics of poverty in the United Kingdom


Example of pensioner poverty news report from 2005

Race and poverty in the UK
Heath, A. and Cheung, S. Y. (2006) Ethnic penalties in the labour market: Employers and discrimination. DWP Research Report No. 341. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.

Disability and Poverty in the UK
Social Services: Made Simple by Tony Byrne, BA, BSc(Econ.), and Colin F. Padfield, LLB, DPA(Lond)

Liam also hosts his own blog about political nuisances in the United Kingdom